A scope matched to the organization

Choose the business-size path closest to your operating reality.

The problems change as a company grows. Startups need a clean foundation. Growing businesses need repeatable work and connected systems. Mid-market and enterprise teams need cross-functional architecture, governance, and disciplined modernization decisions.

Headcount is a guideVendor-neutralSenior-led and scope-first

Different scale. Same discipline.

Every path begins with the work, the decisions, the data, and the people who own the outcome. Technology follows the operating need.

  • No software resale or platform commissions.
  • No inflated transformation scope when a focused decision will do.
  • No small-business shortcut applied to enterprise complexity.
  • A written scope, deliverables, and boundaries before work begins.
Common questions

Choosing a path.

What if we are right on a headcount boundary?

Choose the problem set that matches. Headcount is only a proxy for complexity. The first call confirms fit and adjusts the starting point before any scope is proposed.

Will a startup receive the same assessment sold to a 100-person company?

No. A 1–10 employee business usually needs a narrower foundation plan and guided decisions, not a full multi-workflow Business Systems Assessment.

Can enterprise work start small?

Yes. A bounded decision, domain, integration boundary, or roadmap can be the right unit of work. Large-company experience is useful precisely because it helps define the boundary and dependencies clearly.

Still between paths?

Describe the operating problem and approximate size. You will reach Andrew directly, and the first recommendation may be a smaller step than you expect.

Call (314) 529-1233